<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO and 301 Redirects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tonicarr.com/blog/seo-and-301-redirects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tonicarr.com/blog/seo-and-301-redirects/</link>
	<description>toniCarr</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 16:31:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Toni</title>
		<link>http://www.tonicarr.com/blog/seo-and-301-redirects/#comment-10937</link>
		<dc:creator>Toni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tonicarr.com/blog/?p=46#comment-10937</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave,
Gosh I hope you are still out there. Here it is the end of February and I just wrote a post about &quot;dusting off my blog&quot;. I recently had a similar experience where a clients &quot;secondary site&quot; was showing up better for the main keywords they wanted to be found for than the &quot;primary site&quot;.  I said whoa!!! cut the brakes on your secondary site. Unless it is very important to you. What happened, in the next couple of weeks the primary site reappeared for the &quot;primary search keywords&quot;.

I would like to hear more about your experience so fill free to share if you are still out there. I apologize for not being a &quot;lazy blogger&quot;. Ohhhh my new post idea!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave,<br />
Gosh I hope you are still out there. Here it is the end of February and I just wrote a post about &#8220;dusting off my blog&#8221;. I recently had a similar experience where a clients &#8220;secondary site&#8221; was showing up better for the main keywords they wanted to be found for than the &#8220;primary site&#8221;.  I said whoa!!! cut the brakes on your secondary site. Unless it is very important to you. What happened, in the next couple of weeks the primary site reappeared for the &#8220;primary search keywords&#8221;.</p>
<p>I would like to hear more about your experience so fill free to share if you are still out there. I apologize for not being a &#8220;lazy blogger&#8221;. Ohhhh my new post idea!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David B.</title>
		<link>http://www.tonicarr.com/blog/seo-and-301-redirects/#comment-7496</link>
		<dc:creator>David B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tonicarr.com/blog/?p=46#comment-7496</guid>
		<description>Hi Toni,
I think your statement &quot;Obviously writing in my blog is not my forte&quot; is not accurate - you do write very well, and I have checked out your blog a few times!   I hear you loud and clear on the 301&#039;s - they make me nervous when I have had to do them, and you can always expect a dip when you do them, but rankings will always come back (more or less). 
I can&#039;t tell you how many times I have been called by a client &quot;Hey, where&#039;d my rankings go?.&quot;    My response now is usually &quot;Give it a few days...&quot;

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Toni,<br />
I think your statement &#8220;Obviously writing in my blog is not my forte&#8221; is not accurate &#8211; you do write very well, and I have checked out your blog a few times!   I hear you loud and clear on the 301&#8242;s &#8211; they make me nervous when I have had to do them, and you can always expect a dip when you do them, but rankings will always come back (more or less).<br />
I can&#8217;t tell you how many times I have been called by a client &#8220;Hey, where&#8217;d my rankings go?.&#8221;    My response now is usually &#8220;Give it a few days&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

